State v. Larrinaga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the State's destruction of videotapes of interviews with child abuse victims was not unduly prejudicial to defendant where the State erased the videotaped statements in good faith and the children were prepared to testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).