State v. Larrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he thrust of the Proper opinion is that a Secretary of a military department cannot overrule the recommendations of a civilian correction board on the advice of a military officer unless the findings of the board are not justified by the record before it.”
• an officer’s record before a board must be “substantially complete, and must fairly portray the officer’s record”
• “The [Government] argued that the function of the BCNR was merely advisory and thus the Secretary was free to accept or reject its findings as he saw fit. We rejected that position relying on the act creating the BCNR and its legislative history.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).