State v. Lankester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying state’s challenge to district court order holding habeas petition in abeyance while petitioner exhausted claims in state court
• \[T]he fact that the district court was not required . . . to hold [the state prisoner's] exhausted petition in abeyance does not necessarily imply that the district court was without discretion to do so.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).