State v. Langston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the presumption of delivery arises from evidence that a notice was properly mailed
• noting there is a rebuttable presumption of delivery which arises from evidence that a notice was properly mailed
• holding there is a presumption in criminal cases that \the mailing of a properly stamped and addressed letter which is not returned by the postal authorities gives rise to a rebuttable presumption that the letter was received by the addressee in the due course of mail\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-07-06· cited 34×
• Hopkins v. Harrell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-11-18· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hagner v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1932-04-11· cited 954×
• Cooksey v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-07-19· cited 323×
• Commonwealth v. Crosscup
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-12-17· cited 46×
• Ellis v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-08-09· cited 20×
• Guy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-03-08· cited 19×
• State v. Mays
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-10-08· cited 15×
• State v. Green
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-11-28· cited 7×
• State v. Charles
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-07-06· cited 5×
• State v. Beckham
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-10-25· cited 2×