State v. Langlet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “[w]e do not believe a rational jury sitting in a criminal case would apply anything but the accepted legal meaning of the word [“innocent”] under the circumstances”
• “The sufficiency of the foundation for such inferences must first be determined by the court”
• spoliation inference not appropriate when destruction is not intentional or is merely matter of routine procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).