State v. Lang

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We assume that the legislature intended each part of its enactments to have effect and that, when the legislature uses different words, it means different things”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hawkins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-03· cited 3×
• State v. Hirschman
  Deschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-07· cited 3×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• Mauri v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-12-27· cited 54×
• State v. Castilleja
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-09-18· cited 51×
• State v. Castilleja
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-12-18· cited 38×
• State v. Prince
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-09-14· cited 34×
• State v. Henderson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-08-17· cited 30×
• State v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-03-05· cited 15×
• Mauri v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-07-26· cited 10×
• State v. Willy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-07-22· cited 6×
• People v. Baker
  Mount Vernon City Court· 1991-04-17· cited 5×
• People v. Schenck
  Buffalo City Court· 1992-06-16· cited 1×