Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/19/2024

State v. Lang

Citations

2024 Ohio 3157

Syllabus

Restitution R.C. 2929.18(A)(1). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in deciding a preponderance of the evidence established that victim suffered an economic loss, as a direct and proximate result of appellant-defendant's theft, in the amount ordered as restitution.

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

In re R.P.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-03

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State ex rel. Doner v. Zody
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-12-01· cited 131×
State v. Hill
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-12-20· cited 65×
State v. Yerkey
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-12-05· cited 42×
State v. Rohrbaugh
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-12-27· cited 12×
State v. Halcomb
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-01· cited 5×
State v. Miller
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-11-23· cited 5×
State v. Borger
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-05· cited 4×
State v. Perkins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-30· cited 2×
State v. Dingledine
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-27· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.