State v. Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ER 101 conveys the plain message that the Rules of Evidence will apply in all court proceedings in Washington unless an exception is stated in ER 1101.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martinez
  Washington Supreme Court· 2020-11-19· cited 11×
• State of Washington v. A.M.W.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2024-03-28· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gresham
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-01-05· cited 378×
• Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-12-11· cited 190×
• Dunner v. McLaughlin
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-01-26· cited 150×
• State v. Smith
  Washington Supreme Court· 1974-10-31· cited 146×
• State v. Brayman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-03-03· cited 116×
• State v. George
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-06-07· cited 61×
• State Ex Rel. Hagan v. Chinook Hotel, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-02-04· cited 50×
• State Ex Rel. Morgan v. Kinnear
  Washington Supreme Court· 1972-03-23· cited 30×
• State v. SMH
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-01-17· cited 15×
• State v. S.M.H.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-01-17· cited 14×