State v. Lane

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 1320

Syllabus

After conducting a review of the record as prescribed by Anders, we find no issues with arguable merit for appeal. The sentencing issues raised by Appellant in his supplemental, pro se brief lack arguable merit because Appellant's sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law, and we do not find by clear and convincing evidence that the record does not support Appellant's sentence. In addition, Appellant waived his right to challenge his conviction on speedy-trial grounds by entering a guilty plea. Affirmed.