Washington Supreme Court· 5/4/1989
State v. Lane
Citations
- 771 P.2d 1150
- 112 Wash. 2d 464
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no need to determine the scope of the Alaska constitution's protection in this area because the Alaska constitution was not implicated
- State has ceded exclusive jurisdiction over the Fort Lewis property to the United States
- \The State of Washington may exercise jurisdiction over a criminal offense if an essentiai element of the offense occurred within the state but outside the land ceded to the federal government (where the offense culminated).\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Andersen, Callow, Brachtenbach, Dolliver, Dore, Durham, Smith, Noe, Tern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GrissomSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-11-10· cited 133×
- State v. EllisWashington Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 86×
- Wright v. Colville Tribal Enterprise Corp.Washington Supreme Court· 2006-12-07· cited 44×
- In Re Detention of MartinWashington Supreme Court· 2008-05-01· cited 42×
- In re the Detention of MartinWashington Supreme Court· 2008-05-01· cited 42×
- State v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court· 2005-05-04· cited 33×
- State v. L.J.M.Washington Supreme Court· 1996-06-20· cited 32×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of TeddingtonWashington Supreme Court· 1991-04-11· cited 19×
- State v. DoyleIdaho Supreme Court· 1992-04-01· cited 15×
- State v. L.J.M.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-08-29· cited 13×
- Banowsky v. BackstromWashington Supreme Court· 2019-07-25· cited 9×
- Department of Labor & Industries v. Dirt & Aggregate, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1992-10-08· cited 7×
- State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-01-18· cited 7×
- State v. LeffingwellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-22· cited 5×
- State v. KarpovWashington Supreme Court· 2020-02-27· cited 4×
- Peoples v. Puget Sound's Best Chicken!, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-03· cited 4×
- Mendoza v. Neudorfer Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-06-17· cited 3×
- Michael Ray Evans v. Kenneth DucharmeNinth Circuit· 1999-02-11· cited 1×
- State v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-04-08· cited 1×
- State v. RoblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-03-21· cited 1×
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court· 1892-12-12· cited 815×
- Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court· 1939-01-30· cited 492×
- Silas Mason Co. v. Tax Commission of WashingtonSupreme Court· 1937-12-06· cited 183×
- People v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-04-20· cited 180×
- State v. RobtoyWashington Supreme Court· 1982-11-10· cited 161×
- Rice v. JanovichWashington Supreme Court· 1987-09-24· cited 134×
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court· 1982-04-13· cited 116×
- Lane v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-09-25· cited 106×
- State v. IrizarryWashington Supreme Court· 1988-10-27· cited 93×
- State v. BinghamWashington Supreme Court· 1986-05-15· cited 82×
- State v. OllensWashington Supreme Court· 1987-03-12· cited 54×
- Conrad v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1974-10-21· cited 48×
- People v. HoltIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 46×
- People v. CullenColorado Court of Appeals· 1984-07-26· cited 27×
- Department of Labor & Industries v. Common Carriers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1988-10-20· cited 25×
- Carl Leroy Leonard v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1974-09-23· cited 21×
- People v. MacDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1938-02-04· cited 21×
- Concessions Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court· 1919-12-15· cited 21×
- State v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-09-07· cited 20×
- State v. SvensonWashington Supreme Court· 1985-10-03· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.