State v. Lande

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t would be impossible for an appellate court to lay down specific and intricate rules defining standards of indigency in each case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Vincent
  Utah Supreme Court· 1994-10-21· cited 48×
• Enrique v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-22· cited 26×
• State v. Dubrock
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1983-01-11· cited 15×
• Lineberry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1983-08-08· cited 10×
• McClelland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1996-12-06· cited 8×
• Siplen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-08· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. George v. Arlen
  Second Circuit· 1958-02-24· cited 81×
• United States v. George Daniel Gates
  Fifth Circuit· 1977-08-15· cited 40×
• United States v. Achilles Abbamonte
  Second Circuit· 1965-07-16· cited 30×
• People v. Chism
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1969-04-23· cited 10×
• In re Jones
  Montana Supreme Court· 1963-12-23· cited 4×