Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2/27/1991

State v. Land

Citations

806 P.2d 1156
106 Or. App. 131
1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

no exploitation where illegal entry by police onto defendant’s premises did not yield evidence of illegal activity
no exploitation of unlawful entry because police smelled marijuana before entering and “did not observe anything that prompted them to seek defendant’s consent”
no exploitation where illegal entry by police onto defendant's premises did not yield evidence of illegal activity
no exploitation of unlawful entry because police smelled marijuana before entering and \did not observe anything that prompted them to seek defendant's consent \
exploitation occurs when officers “trade on” information that is obtained as a result of an illegality, e.g., when officers make an unauthorized entry and observe something that prompts them to seek consent to search the premises
knock and talk search upheld based on consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Riggs, Edmonds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.