State v. Lamarche

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that this factor did not weigh heavily in the defendant’s favor when the defendant waited ten months between his indictment and the assertion of his right to a speedy trial
• holding that the third factor of the Barker analysis did not weigh heavily in the defendant’s favor because “he waited nearly six months from the time the State entered the nolle prosequi and approximately ten months from the date of his indictment” to assert his speedy trial right
• “Because we conclude that the defendant has failed to develop his argument that the statute is facially invalid, we further limit our analysis to his as applied claim.”
• the constitutionality of a statute as applied is a question of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).