State v. Lake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing physical force used to restrain assault and sexual assault victim
• declining to afford review of unpreserved claim that proffered evi- dence was admissible under subdivision [2] of rape shield statute when victim did not testify on direct examination about her prior sexual conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harrington v. United States
  Second Circuit· 2012-08-06· cited 98×
• State v. Malon
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-06-13· cited 9×
• State v. Villafane
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1997-05-06· cited 5×
• State v. Njoku
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-02-16

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chambers v. Mississippi
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
• Washington v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
• State v. Golding
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
• State v. Kulmac
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-05· cited 159×
• State v. Mastropetre
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-08-01· cited 100×
• State v. Thurman
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-03-31· cited 96×
• State v. Rothenberg
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-02-19· cited 73×
• State v. Rinaldi
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-11-12· cited 65×
• Christiano v. Connecticut
  Supreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 61×
• State v. Christiano
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-02-08· cited 57×
• State v. Cassidy
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1985-03-12· cited 51×
• State v. Arnold
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-26· cited 31×
• State v. Butler
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-07-28· cited 16×
• City of Stamford v. Kovac
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-06-14· cited 9×