State v. Lafond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a seizure under the \plain feel\ exception where arresting officer testified that he identified the contraband based on over 100 different experiences handling or seeing cocaine rocks
• in reviewing a ruling on a motion to suppress, the appellate court must determine whether the facts relied upon by the trial court support its legal conclusions
• in reviewing a ruling on a motion to suppress, the appellate court must determine whether the facts relied upon by the trial court support its legal conclusions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Campuzano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-08· cited 16×
• C.A.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-19· cited 8×
• CAM v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-19· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Curtis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-12· cited 40×
• Doney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-28· cited 15×
• State v. Wikso
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-23· cited 6×
• State v. Terrell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-21· cited 3×