Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/3/1984
State v. Lafferty
Citations
- 192 Conn. 571
- 472 A.2d 1275
- 1984 Conn. LEXIS 548
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court accepted compulsive or pathological gambling as volitional insanity defense to charge of embezzlement, defendant acquitted; appellate court did not reach issue
- “we construe the term ‘danger’ according to the ‘commonly approved usage of the language’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grillo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 741×
- State v. BeltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-06-28· cited 82×
- State v. PerruccioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-01-31· cited 74×
- Winfred Overholser v. Herbert T. O'BeirneD.C. Circuit· 1962-06-08· cited 53×
- Winfred Overholser, Superintendent, St. Elizabeths Hospital v. Robert Stanley RussellD.C. Circuit· 1960-09-19· cited 23×
- State v. LaffertySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-03-01· cited 21×
- State v. LaffertySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-08-09· cited 15×
- State v. MacCioliNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1970-05-13· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.