State v. Ladwig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in prosecution for driving with .10 percent or more of alcohol in the blood, it was not necessary for an expert witness to extrapolate for the jury; however, evidence necessary to enable the finder of fact to extrapolate was required
• retrograde extrapolation testimony necessary to convict defendant of per se violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).