State v. LaChappell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court properly found that the defendant’s statement, “the test was over,” was not an invocation of the right to cut off questioning
• statement that “[the polygraph] test was over” was at best “ambiguous,” and trial court resolved ambiguity against defendant
• “[c]ustody determinations are obviously mixed questions of law and fact which require that the entire circumstances of the particular case be carefully assessed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).