State v. L. J. L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• on reconsideration, distinguishing Floyd, supra, by holding that Board’s denial of § 3.321(b) extrasehedular rating was authorized
• when evaluating an increased rating claim, it is well established that the Board may affirm an RO's conclusion that a claim does not meet the criteria for submission for an extraschedular rating pursuant to 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1), or may reach such a conclusion on its own
• issue referred to RO is not on appeal
• remanding an inextricably intertwined claim
• discussing 38 C.F.R. § 3.321(b)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).