State v. Kyger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “to be a substantial step, the defendant’s conduct must (1) advance the criminal purpose charged and (2) provide some verification of the existence of that purpose”
• “[T]o be a substantial step the act must be strongly corrob- orative of the actor’s criminal purpose”—i.e., “defendant’s conduct must (1) advance the criminal purpose charged and (2
• “[T]o be a substantial step the act must be strongly corrob- orative of the actor’s criminal purpose”—i.e., “defendant’s conduct must (1) advance the criminal purpose charged and (2) provide some verification of the existence of that pur- pose.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hubbell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2023-10-05· cited 48×
• State v. Kyger
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 10×
• State v. Wesley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-22· cited 9×
• State v. Bostwick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-05-25· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kyger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-22· cited 10×
• State v. Kyger
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 10×