State v. Kupihea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's crouching motion, without more, was insufficient to justify a stop, and the subsequent seizure of firearms was improper
• holding that defendant’s crouching motion, without more, was insufficient to justify a stop, and the subsequent seizure of firearms was improper
• action of automobile passengers in looking toward police and crouching down not a justification for stop
• action of automobile passengers in looking toward police and crouching down not a justification for stop
• two passengers in vehicle looked back in direction of police and crouched down, not grounds for stop
• two passengers in vehicle looked back in direction of police and crouched down, not grounds for stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1983-03-28· cited 100×
• McChesney v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 75×
• United States v. Johnson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-08-05· cited 44×
• State v. Heapy
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2007-01-11· cited 35×
• Robison v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2011-01-19· cited 7×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sibron v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
• State v. Ogata
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1977-12-27· cited 46×