State v. Kunzer

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 2959

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in admitting the statements made by defendant-appellant to employees of his attorney. The defendant-appellant can be charged with intimidation and retaliation in the same indictment under the facts presented. Further, the State presented sufficient evidence to support the defendant-appellant's convictions for intimidation. Since the defendant-appellant's findings of guilt for retaliation merged for the purpose of sentencing, we need not consider the sufficiency of the evidence because any error would be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Judgment affirmed.