State v. Kukowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to interpret rule 2.19(9) “in a manner that could interfere” with a constitutional right
• stating rule 2.19(9) gives the defendant an opportunity to affirm or deny the allegations the State is obligated to prove at the second trial
• noting the court must “ensure that the affirmation is voluntary and intelligent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).