State v. Kuhnley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that State was permitted to introduce extrinsic evidence showing prior conduct by defendant to contradict material evidence testified to by defendant
• thief cannot be accomplice to offense of knowingly receiving stolen goods
• another case of the thief and receiver of stolen property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).