Skip to main content

State v. Krueger

Citations

  • 351 N.W.2d 738
  • 119 Wis. 2d 327
  • 1984 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant was not entitled to modification because “the so-called ‘new factor’ was, in fact, known to the trial judge at the time of sentencing”
  • Courts reviewing sentencing presume lower court “acted reasonably during sentencing, so defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence complained of.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bablitch, Dykman, Beilfuss, Reserve

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Krueger

26 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.