State v. Kronenberger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the URA is uniquely tied to the Fifth Amendment principle of just compensation, It is designed to make plaintiffs whole.”
• noting that though “40% is within the acceptable range, awards more typically range between 20% to 30% of the total fund, with 50% being the upper limit.” (citations omitted)
• disagreeing with the proposition “that the fee arrangement with named plaintiffs creates a 13 presumption of reasonableness”
• approving a contingency fee equal to 40% of principal and interest, resulting in an effective fee of 24%, and noting that although “40% is within the acceptable range, awards more typically range between 20% to 30% of the total fund, with 50% being the úpper limit”
• attorney’s fee awards are “committed to the sound discretion of the court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).