Skip to main content

State v. Kramer

Citations

  • 580 S.E.2d 314
  • 260 Ga. App. 546
  • 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1195
  • 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the State “may not appeal the exclusion of evidence which is based only upon some general rule of evidence”
  • noting that while the State “may not appeal the exclusion of evidence which is based only upon some general rule of evidence!,]” it may, nevertheless, “appeal an order . . . based upon general rules of evidence and a determination that the evidence was illegally obtained”
  • trial court did not err in granting motion to suppress seizure of videotapes where, among other things, there was no evidence the accused showed videotapes to the victim, videotaped the victim, or watched videotapes with the victim
  • trial court did not err in granting motion to suppress seized videotapes where, among other things, there was no evidence the accused showed videotapes to the victim, videotaped the victim, or watched videotapes with the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Ruffin, Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.