Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/10/1992
State v. Koopman
Citations
- 844 P.2d 1024
- 68 Wash. App. 514
- 1992 Wash. App. LEXIS 527
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting appellant’s claim that her Miranda warnings were defective because she had not been explicitly told she had the right to have counsel present before and during questioning
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Munson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Duckworth v. EaganSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 652×
- Stone v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1971-05-17· cited 207×
- State v. BondsWashington Supreme Court· 1982-11-10· cited 163×
- United States v. Alphonse JohnsonSecond Circuit· 1972-08-11· cited 72×
- United States v. Anthony CaldwellEighth Circuit· 1992-02-18· cited 69×
- People v. HazelhurstSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-05-02· cited 49×
- People v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado· 1973-12-31· cited 39×
- United States v. GerenaD. Connecticut· 1987-07-07· cited 17×
- White v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1988-01-14· cited 9×
- People v. BallColorado Court of Appeals· 1991-09-26· cited 5×
- Caldwell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-10-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.