State v. Kone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a taped interview met the requirement of necessity because the witness had later recanted, making the taped interview “the only means by which the State could introduce the information it had received”
• finding necessity where witness “later recanted her statements made in the interview, [and] the admission of the tape was the only means by which the State could introduce the information it had received from” the witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Metz
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2001-11-15· cited 16×
• State of Iowa v. Jerme David Hopwood
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-10-28
• State of Iowa v. Joshua Jarrett
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2018-02-21
• State of Iowa v. Timothy M. Fontenot
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2021-04-23

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rojas
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1994-11-23· cited 44×
• State v. Weaver
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1996-09-18· cited 33×