State v. Koch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the maximum sentence that [the] defendant lawfully could have received [on a greater-inclusive offense] would have been an 18-month term of incarceration,” the maximum departure sentence for the defendant’s grid block
• holding a 24-month sentence for forgery unconstitutional because it exceeded the maximum sentence that the defendant could have received for a more serious forgery conviction
• offenses occurring on different dates did not arise from the same criminal episode for purposes of imposing consecutive sentences
• “Under Article I, section 16, we compare the actual sentence imposed to the maximum sentence allowed by law for the greater offense to evaluate a disproportionality challenge.”
• to same effect respecting sentences for two kinds of forgery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Simonson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-06-15· cited 9×
• State v. Mallory
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-20· cited 7×
• State v. Barajas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-12· cited 5×
• State v. Dobash
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-27· cited 3×
• State v. Chase
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-11-02· cited 1×
• Sexton v. Persson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-31· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Shumway
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-06-23· cited 108×
• Cannon v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1955-03-23· cited 98×
• State v. Turner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-02-15· cited 39×
• Merrill v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1959-04-15· cited 25×
• State v. McLain
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-17· cited 16×
• State v. Ferman-Velasco
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-12-09· cited 13×
• State v. Rice
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-08· cited 9×
• State v. Davilla
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-12-16· cited 6×