Skip to main content

State v. Koch

Citations

  • 112 P.3d 69
  • 107 Haw. 215
  • 2005 Haw. LEXIS 245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Koch did not qualify as a first-time drug offender for two chronologically separate drug offenses for which he was convicted and sentenced on the same day at a consolidated hearing
  • holding that Koch did not qualify as a first-time drug offender for two chronologically separate drug offenses for which he was convicted and sentenced on the same day at a consolidated hearing
  • holding that the circuit court had erred by assuming, in sentencing the defendant, that 33 he “had engaged in unlawful conduct of which he had been expressly acquitted”
  • holding that the circuit court had erred by assuming, in sentencing the defendant, that 33 he “had engaged in unlawful conduct of which he had been expressly acquitted”
  • holding sentencing court could not consider allegations of drug dealing when jury acquitted the defendant of ”dealing charges”
  • sentencing court ‘‘did not have the discretion to con- sider alleged conduct of which [the defendant] was acquitted in sentencing him’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Duffy, Acoba

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.