Supreme Court of Alabama· 6/26/2015
State v. Knox
Citations
- 201 So. 3d 1213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a new legal question may not be considered for the first time on appeal
- noting that, pursuant to Ex parte Jenkins, an appellant may \provide additional precise reasons and authorities [on appeal] in support of a theory or position properly raised below\ (emphasis added; emphasis omitted)
- explaining that, although additional arguments and reasoning may be presented on appeal regarding issues properly presented to the trial court, a different or new legal question may not be raised for the first time on appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bolin, Bryan, Main, Moore, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Stuart, Wise
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2016-07-08· cited 13×
- Moore-Dennis v. FranklinSupreme Court of Alabama· 2016-02-26· cited 5×
- W.F. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2015-10-30· cited 1×
- T.J. v. Winston County Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2017-03-24· cited 1×
- State v. KnoxCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2015-10-23
- Holland v. HollandCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2017-08-18
- William Darby v. State of AlabamaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2023-03-24
- David Roberson and Anna Roberson v. Drummond Company, Inc. (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court: CV-19-901210).Supreme Court of Alabama· 2024-02-09
- Andy Sumblin v. Zachary Ward, as administrator of the Estate of Keith Ward (Appeal from Coffee Circuit Court: CV-19-900012).Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2024-07-19
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1992-11-13· cited 402×
- Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-12-02· cited 242×
- Beavers v. County of WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1994-08-05· cited 140×
- Cantu v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1994-04-16· cited 103×
- Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama· 2003-06-27· cited 99×
- United States v. Jessie Jerome Perkins, Jr., Johnny Lewis ScottEleventh Circuit· 2003-10-22· cited 88×
- Biddie v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1987-09-25· cited 78×
- Home Indem. Co. v. Reed Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1980-03-07· cited 75×
- State v. ApplegateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-03-05· cited 55×
- Allsopp v. Bolding, 1100432 (Ala. 9-30-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama· 2011-09-30· cited 53×
- Defore v. Bourjois, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1958-10-09· cited 50×
- Ex Parte MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama· 2004-04-09· cited 49×
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-03-05· cited 45×
- Rodriguez-Ramos v. J. Thomas WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-04-26· cited 36×
- Marks v. TenbrunselSupreme Court of Alabama· 2005-04-22· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.