State v. Knoefler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that since one of the car’s occupants had to have been driving, and all three were drunk, then someone must have been driving under the influence of alcohol
• DUI case wherein the court noted \the connection of the accused with the crime need not be proven to establish the corpus delicti \
• DUI case wherein the court noted \the connection of the accused with the crime need not be proven to establish the corpus delicti\
• DUI case wherein the court noted “the connection of the accused with the crime need not be proven to establish the corpus delicti”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bishop
  Utah Supreme Court· 1988-02-03· cited 250×
• State v. Petree
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-02-04· cited 148×
• State v. Johnson
  Utah Supreme Court· 1991-11-01· cited 74×
• State v. Archuleta
  Utah Supreme Court· 1993-03-25· cited 62×
• State v. Allen
  Utah Supreme Court· 1992-09-04· cited 55×
• State v. Kimbel
  Utah Supreme Court· 1980-10-29· cited 27×
• State v. Rebeterano
  Utah Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 24×
• People v. Moreno
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-01-23· cited 18×
• State v. Calamity
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-03-23· cited 12×
• State v. Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-07-21· cited 11×
• State v. Colorado
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-29· cited 11×
• City of Easley v. Portman
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-07-21· cited 8×
• State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-08-20· cited 7×
• State v. Hansen
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1993-08-04· cited 5×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Cazier
  Utah Supreme Court· 1974-04-11· cited 14×