Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/9/2003
State v. Knight
Citations
- 266 Conn. 658
- 835 A.2d 47
- 2003 Conn. LEXIS 479
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding collateral estoppel does not apply to the proceduraily unique situation in which several criminal charges against the same defendant have been allocated between two triers for concurrent adjudication in a single proceeding
- fact that jury rendered not guilty verdict on some charges first did not preclude court from rendering guilty verdict on other charge immediately thereafter, as trial proceedings were simultaneous
- inconsistency between factual determinations of separate fact finders as to different, albeit similar, charges does not render outcome illogical or unreasonable
- collateral estoppel given constitutional dimensions by double jeopardy clause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Katz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. StatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-27· cited 68×
- State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-21· cited 63×
- State v. GarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-08-03· cited 32×
- State v. MourningConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-10-30· cited 17×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-03-19· cited 13×
- State v. GambleConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-02-09· cited 12×
- State v. RamirezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-15· cited 11×
- United States v. McMillianDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-05-18· cited 10×
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-12-19· cited 9×
- Coyle Crete, LLC v. NevinsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-08-21· cited 9×
- State v. ArroyoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-10-09· cited 3×
- State v. JUTRASConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-06-15· cited 3×
- State v. SunilaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-12-26· cited 3×
- Gamble v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-01-23· cited 3×
- State v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-07-31· cited 3×
- State v. SladeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-09-12· cited 3×
- Hemming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-06-26· cited 3×
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-06-25· cited 2×
- State v. SolomonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-05-27
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,075×
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1932-01-11· cited 1,678×
- Harris v. RiveraSupreme Court· 1981-12-14· cited 429×
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 156×
- United States v. Joseph MayburySecond Circuit· 1960-01-27· cited 152×
- Shell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-24· cited 125×
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-12-22· cited 100×
- Barden v. Junior College District No. 520Supreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 97×
- State v. DecaroSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-02-29· cited 92×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-12-13· cited 86×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Jack Chilingirian, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 2002-02-13· cited 78×
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California, Inc. v. Board of Equalization of CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1991-02-19· cited 71×
- United States v. WrightEleventh Circuit· 1995-09-12· cited 64×
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-28· cited 53×
- Akers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-02-22· cited 48×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-09-10· cited 48×
- State v. NowellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-18· cited 48×
- United States v. Frank R. West, United States of America v. American Beef Packers, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1977-04-04· cited 45×
- State v. AparoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-11· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.