State v. Knight

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that the trial court’s authority over bond forfeiture must be exercised in accordance with the relevant statutory provisions
• recognizing “the plain language used in [Section] 15A-544.5 and the statute’s legislative history demonstrate that the General Assembly intended to limit a trial court’s authority in setting aside a bond forfeiture before the entry of a final judgment”
• recognizing “the plain language used in [Section] 15A-544.5 and the statute’s legislative history demonstrate that the General Assembly intended to limit a trial court’s authority in setting aside a bond forfeiture before the entry of a final judgment”
• discussing Chapter 15A and a court's statutory authority to issue an order granting relief from a bond
• “[B]y its plain language, [Section] 15A-544.5 provides the ‘exclusive’ relief for setting aside a bond forfeiture that has not yet become a final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Isaacs
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-10-02· cited 4×
• State of NC v. Ortiz
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-08-06
• State v. Cash
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-03-17
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-06-16
• State v. Roulhac
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-09-01
• State v. Doss
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-11-03
• State v. Slade
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-02-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2012-02-07· cited 16×
• Long v. Hammond
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2004-06-01· cited 2×