State v. Knezevich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court reviewing the Commissioner’s decision must consider the record as a whole
• holding that a court reviewing the Commissioner’s decision must consider the record as a whole
• holding that a court reviewing the Commissioner’s decision must consider the record as a whole
• holding that the 21 Commissioner's decision cannot be affirmed “simply by isolating a specific quantum 22 of supporting evidence”
• holding that if evidence reasonably supports the Commissioner’s 4 decision, the reviewing court must uphold the decision and may not substitute its 5 own judgment
• holding that the claimant bears the burden of proof at steps one through four

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).