Supreme Court of Missouri· 12/18/1992
State v. Knapp
Citations
- 843 S.W.2d 345
- 1992 Mo. LEXIS 140
- 1992 WL 372239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[i]n determining legislative intent, the reviewing court should take into consideration statutes involving similar or related subject matter when those statutes shed light on the meaning of the statute being construed”
- interpreting language in section 1.205 to mean a fetus in útero is considered a person for purposes of involuntary manslaughter statute
- interpreting language in section 1.205 to mean a fetus in utero is considered a person for purposes of involuntary manslaughter statute
- stating sections 1.205 and 188.015,were passed on the same day and as part of the same act and finding section 1.205 and another statute were in pan materia under similar reasoning
- stating sections 1.205 and 188.015 were passed on the same day and as part of the same act and finding section 1.205 and another statute were in pari materia under similar reasoning
- an unborn child is person for the purposes of the involuntary manslaughter statute, section 565.024
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Limbaugh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sullivan v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-04-20· cited 83×
- Farmers' Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-10-20· cited 66×
- Connor v. Monkem Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1995-05-30· cited 51×
- Melody FRYE, Respondent, v. Ronald J. LEVY, Director, State of Missouri, Department of Social Services, Children’s Division, AppellantSupreme Court of Missouri· 2014-07-08· cited 38×
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Ken Kauffman & Sons Excavating, L.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-02-19· cited 34×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-10-16· cited 34×
- State v. RousseauMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-12-26· cited 33×
- Columbia Athletic Club v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-01-27· cited 29×
- Ankrom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 2013-01-11· cited 28×
- State v. HolcombMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-09-09· cited 26×
- Such v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-06-26· cited 24×
- City of Washington v. Warren CountySupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-05-30· cited 23×
- Irvin v. KempkerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-10-26· cited 22×
- Baldwin v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri· 2001-01-31· cited 22×
- Milton Young v. Boone Electric CooperativeMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-04-14· cited 22×
- In Interest of TGMissouri Court of Appeals· 1998-03-31· cited 21×
- Phillips v. American Motorist Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-05-04· cited 17×
- May v. Greater Kansas City Dental SocietyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-11-02· cited 17×
- State v. BechholdMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-01-29· cited 16×
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Missouri· 1997-03-25· cited 14×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lincoln Credit Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-07-06· cited 151×
- State v. KrausSupreme Court of Missouri· 1975-12-18· cited 98×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri· 1981-10-13· cited 87×
- State Ex Rel. McNary v. StussieSupreme Court of Missouri· 1974-11-29· cited 52×
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri· 1985-09-10· cited 47×
- State v. DurenSupreme Court of Missouri· 1977-03-15· cited 38×
- Rambo v. LawsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1990-11-20· cited 26×
- State v. HobokinSupreme Court of Missouri· 1989-04-18· cited 24×
- Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Director of Revenue, State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-10-12· cited 22×
- Boyd-Richardson Co. v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Missouri· 1981-04-06· cited 21×
- State v. HolmesMissouri Court of Appeals· 1983-05-03· cited 13×
- State v. YountMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-06-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.