State v. Knapp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]o be entitled to an instruction” on these affirmative defenses, “the defendant must establish a prima facie case on each of the elements of the defense asserted”
• noting that there must be \vital link-up\ between restitution order and \damage caused by the criminal conduct for which the defendant was convicted\
• \An order of restitution must relate to the damage caused by the criminal conduct for which the defendant was convicted.\
• “An order of restitution must relate to the damage caused by the criminal conduct for which the defendant was convicted.”
• “To be entitled to an instruction ... the defendant must establish a prima facie case on each of the elements of the defense asserted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rouleau
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-30· cited 51×
• State v. Kenvin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-11-04· cited 25×
• State v. Madril
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-01-15· cited 17×
• State v. Bohannon
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-03-11· cited 14×
• State v. Cameron Albarelli
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-11-18· cited 14×
• State v. David G. Buckley
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-05-27· cited 13×
• State v. Thayer
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-08-20· cited 9×
• State v. Ty Baker, Sr.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2017-10-06· cited 8×
• State v. Wetter
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-09-16· cited 3×
• Darling v. Central Vermont Public Service Corp.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-09-21· cited 3×
• State v. Leopold
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2005-08-02· cited 2×
• In re Laura Hernandez
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2021-09-03· cited 2×
• State v. Stimpson
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-06-15· cited 2×