· 1/16/2018
State v. Kloos
Citations
- 913 N.W.2d 777
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the judiciary, not the BIA, is charged with the responsibility for interpreting federal criminal statutes
- finding there was no ambiguity in the parenthetical “relating to tax evasion” in section 101(a)(43)(M)(ii) of the Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.