State v. Klink

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 3844

Syllabus

Appellant did not request a presentence investigation (\PSI\). The trial court was required to impose a prison sentence for appellant's firearm specification, and it chose to impose prison terms for involuntary manslaughter and aggravated robbery under these circumstances, it was within the court's discretion not to order a PSI. The trial court made the findings required to impose consecutive sentences, namely that at least two of the multiple offenses were committed as part of a course of conduct and that the harm was so great that no single term would adequately reflect the seriousness of appellant's conduct. We cannot clearly and convincingly find that the record did not support the trial court's findings. Judgment affirmed.