State v. Klaus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding claim that trial court erred in failing to consider probation not cognizable on direct appeal after guilty plea
• dismissing direct appeal from a guilty plea where issue was neither subject matter jurisdiction of the trial court nor a challenge to the sufficiency of the charging instrument
• dismissing a direct appeal following a guilty plea in which the defendant claimed the court erroneously failed to consider probation, and noting that “[Challenges to the legality of the sentence imposed may be considered only in response to a Rule 24.035 motion”
• dismissing a direct appeal following a guilty plea in which the defendant claimed the court erroneously failed to consider probation, and noting that “[c]hallenges to the legality of the sentence imposed may be considered only in response to a Rule 24.035 motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).