State v. Kittleson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the exclusionary rule did not require suppression” of evidence of defendant’s assault on an officer even if the officer illegally entered defendant’s home
• concluding that “the exclusionary rule did not require suppression of the evidence” of defendant’s assault on an officer even if the officer illegally entered defendant’s home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).