State v. Kinstler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the instruction is not warranted where discrepancies “are of the type that suggest lapses in memory,” rather than allowing a reasonable infer- ence of conscious lying
• addressing whether the witness-false-in-part instruction was required and con- cluding that it was not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Labossiere
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-11-18· cited 6×
• State v. Gocan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-20· cited 6×
• State v. Daly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-16· cited 5×
• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-22· cited 4×
• State v. Villanueva
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-08

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sandstrom v. Montana
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
• State v. Payne
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-07-02· cited 72×
• State v. Payne
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-07-03· cited 10×
• State v. Kinstler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-09-11· cited 1×