State v. Kingman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court order denying state’s petition for an order of public use and necessity for “good cause appearing” did not constitute a finding of fact or a conclusion of law
• discusses CR 52(c) which applies to bench trials
• discusses CR 52(c) which applies to bench trials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Little v. King
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 121×
• Peoples National Bank v. Birney's Enterprises, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-07-05· cited 23×
• Kinney v. Bauch
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-04-16· cited 13×
• City of Blaine v. Feldstein
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-08-15· cited 11×
• Conklin v. Conklin
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1998-11-25· cited 8×
• Daves v. Nastos
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-01-21· cited 5×
• State v. Burch
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-02-01· cited 3×
• State v. Kingman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1971-08-03· cited 2×
• DGHI Enterprises v. Pacific Cities, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-05-18· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ferree v. Doric Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1963-07-18· cited 147×
• Rutter v. Rutter
  Washington Supreme Court· 1962-04-12· cited 51×
• State Ex Rel. Lange v. SUP. CT. FOR KING CTY.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1963-01-02· cited 35×