State v. King
Citations
- 92 Kan. 989
- 142 P. 296
- 1914 Kan. LEXIS 358
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Persistent Violation of Liquor Laws — Sufficient Complaint and Warrant. The portion of a charge contained in a complaint and warrant for persistent violation of the prohibitory law which states that the accused sold intoxicating liquor on a date within the statute of limitations sufficiently specifies the nature of that element of the accusation and authorizes the holding of a preliminary examination.</p> <p>2. Same — Preliminary Examination Waived — Findings of Examining Magistrate. If a preliminary examination be waived it is not necessary that the examining magistrate find that any particular transaction of sale has occurred, or that there is probable cause to believe the accused guilty of any particular transaction of sale, in order to hold the accused for trial.</p> <p>3. Same. Where upon waiver of preliminary examination the magistrate makes the usual findings and holds the accused, an information may be filed which charges the offense described in the warrant without the specification of any particular transaction of sale, and the accused may be placed on trial for such offense.</p>
Judges: Burch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.