State v. King
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 4229
Syllabus
The State adduced sufficient evidence at trial to support findings of appellant's guilt for felonious assault and domestic violence, and the guilty verdicts were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Based upon our holding in State v. Wilson, 2d Dist. Clark No. 2018-CA-2, 2020-Ohio-2962, as applied to the facts of this case, the trial court's failure to merge the felonious assault and domestic violence offenses constituted plain error. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-29· cited 966×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
- State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court· 2005-11-30· cited 390×
- State v. Earley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-11-10· cited 146×
- State v. BentonOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-07· cited 38×
- State v. LeGrantOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-31· cited 35×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-15· cited 21×
- State v. ShoecraftOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-28· cited 19×
- State v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-15· cited 14×
- State v. GrayOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-01· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.