State v. King

Citations

• 67 Wash. 651
• 122 P. 323
• 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1225

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Review—Harmless Error. Error in excluding evidence is cured where the fact was established by other evidence.</p> <p>Witnesses — Cross-Examination—Criminal Law. Where the accused offered himself as a witness and testified that he had been looking for work and could not find it; it is not error to allow cross-examination showing that he had not had a steady job for some time before the commission of the crime.</p> <p>Robbery — Identity oe Accused — Possession oe Stolen Property —Evidence—Sufficiency. A conviction of robbery is sustained where part of the property taken was found in defendant’s possession, and he was taken shortly after the robbery in the vicinity where the crime was committed, although there was no direct evidence of identity. . ,</p>