Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 5/14/1985
State v. King
Citations
- 367 N.W.2d 599
- 1985 Minn. App. LEXIS 4175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to depart from the presumptive sentence because appellant’s contention that she was not the aggressor in the incident was not clear from the evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-07· cited 267×
- State v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-09-12· cited 104×
- State v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-08-01· cited 81×
- State v. StufflebeanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-21· cited 58×
- State v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-02-05· cited 54×
- State v. MarquettiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-07-23· cited 36×
- State v. SalasSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-06-19· cited 32×
- State v. CraceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-07-13· cited 27×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-12-21· cited 25×
- State v. FrostSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-12-09· cited 23×
- State v. LinkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-09-21· cited 22×
- State v. DiamondSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-04-09· cited 18×
- State v. MunnellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-03-07· cited 13×
- State v. ArndtSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-03-10· cited 7×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-02-05· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.