State v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding implied consent to defendant’s presence sufficient to rebut the element of entry without consent
• finding the State did not prove entry without consent because the defendant had “implied consent to enter” and victims never effectively revoked consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Franklin
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1985-05-22· cited 13×
• Stan T. Fenske v. John Thalacker
  Eighth Circuit· 1995-09-07· cited 12×
• Fenske v. State
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1999-03-24· cited 4×
• State of Iowa v. Steven Paul Seelye Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2014-05-29
• State of Iowa v. Benjamin Elliott Lane
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-12-09
• State of Iowa v. Leon Chevelle Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2018-08-01

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1980-02-20· cited 183×
• State v. Aldape
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-06-17· cited 108×
• State v. Schrier
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-01-14· cited 96×
• State v. Welton
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1981-01-14· cited 43×
• State v. Morelock
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1969-02-11· cited 31×