State v. King
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 918
Syllabus
Appellant's convictions for purposeful and felony murder with firearm specifications were supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Trial court erred in permitting introduction of a business card representing appellant's involvement in a rap music production business, but error did not affect substantial rights and, therefore, was harmless.
Judges: Dorrian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 4,990×
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 3,796×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. Hartman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-09-22· cited 223×
- State v. PettyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 45×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-02· cited 34×
- State v. WatkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-20· cited 17×
- State v. ShortOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-11· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.